In the modern world, social networking sites represent an enormous amount of opportunities, such as communicating with friends, reading publications, watching videos, sharing your information, engaging in discussions, creating communities, and much more, which gives social networking sites the opportunity to call them a great social networking achievement.
But there is the reverse side of the medal. Mistakes come together with enormous opportunities of these sites. It’s inappropriate to claim that social networking sites are a single solid problem. With disciplined and correct interaction, you can get some benefits from social networking sites, such as search engine Google, Facebook or Twitter and make life easier for you. But there is always the risk that wrong interaction with the Internet will have harmful effects on your psyche. That’s why the issue of Rogerian Argument is created. In this article, we want to provide our readers with the example of Rogerian Argument Essay that can be used in the education of college students.
Rogerian Argument Essay Sample
Rogerian Argument: Do Facebook, Twitter and other social websites do more harm than good? Let’s take a look at how these sites influence the people.
Social networking sites excite centers of satisfaction in the brain of users, which is the reason for the risk of a significant science. The users feel pleasant emotions every time they read a positive commentary from their friends under photos or when those friends remain a good review. Important repetitive appeals of these emotions force people to visit the space of social networking sites, forcing users to spend more time in these sites. So let’s find out the positive interaction of these sites.
Information is probably the greatest advantage of these sites interaction with people. Social networking has become a virtual crunch of information. You can be aware of any information on any topic on Twitter or other sites.
Fun is another popular advantage of interaction with these sites. Users can download games, visit specialized sites, communicate with experienced gamers; these sites provide any services in the field of the gaming industry.
Today, many services have moved into the network. Among them is payment for housing services, job search, buying tickets for your favorite movies, guidance on a range of issues that cover all aspects of life, hotel reservation. Many services may be unavailable offline or may be much more expensive than on these sites.
Important prerequisites for the formation of any dependence from social media is the speed and accessibility. People instinctively seek the easiest ways to achieve satisfaction, even if these paths are ineffective and lead to harmful consequences. Take a look, for instance, at a habit of smoking. Quick and affordable, that’s why people smoke.
Let’s list the main problems that cause dependence on interaction from social networking sites:
Lowering the concentration of attention.
Information from these sites is assimilated quickly, spontaneously and in small portions. With such actions, the brain of people is accustomed to working with information and gradually loses the ability to keep an eye on something, that’s why the syndrome of attention and activity deficits. Social media promotes users’ temptation to cross over at once and simultaneously carry out several processes, such as communication, music listening, meeting discussions, that are available for people on Facebook and Twitter.
Social networking sites badly affect the abilities of thinking of people. It’s hard to be aware of everything, for example, during reading a book in high school. Following this habit, people begin to jump from one subject to another. That’s why the difficulties arise in order to ponder one problem, as attention is constantly distracted.
One of the effects of social networking sites is Internet dependence. Social networking can turn people into a kind of brain gum. People are accustomed to receiving some information constantly, and if this doesn’t happen, people begin to feel the information breakdown. It’s expressed in the fact that it becomes difficult for us to relax in those situations when the brain receives little data.
During working in a mode of continuous flow of information and changing each other’s emotional impressions whether at work or in high school, the body feels stress. In addition, when people work in social networks, they look at the monitor, and the surplus of such activity leads to fatigue.
Alienation, reduction of intelligence.
When people spend a lot of time on social networking sites, our brain is busy with meaningless and inappropriate activity, which can’t be called a full-fledged intellectual work. Instead, people could think of friends in high school or family, come to the solution of life problems, build plans for the future, come up with some useful idea, read a good book, find new interaction. But this isn’t possible until your mind is puzzled by chewing the Internet chewing gum, turning users of Facebook and Twitter into thoughtless and alienated zombies.
To sum everything up, it’s your decision to make whether to agree or disagree with the Rogerian Argument. Social networking can be just as harmful as helpful. There are a hundred effects of it.
The interaction between people and friends has always been the main purpose of the Internet. There are many social networking sites that make it easy for you to establish a friendship with people, share thoughts to your friends, study the culture of different nationalities, find any information you want, even about effects of the death penalty, on the other words, be aware of everything.
The Internet is an environment with fast actions and quick reactions. A quick change of stimuli brings the brain to work with these abnormally small intervals of time. But social networking sites is unnatural for the brain of people, adapted during evolution to completely different speeds. Moreover, social media with its high speed contradicts the natural rhythms of nature. Breaking away from the screen of Facebook or Twitter, people fall into the world, where they still need to wait.